Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Pauline v. Seabright et al
as 1:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Alden Pauline
Defendant:
J. Michael Seabright, Mark A. Inciong, Tommy Kong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roush v. Talbert et al
as 3:2014cv02490
Plaintiff:
Shane Roush
Defendant:
Al Talbert, Dr. Stine, Dr. Kong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian Kong v. Michael F Martel
as 5:2014cv02096
Petitioner:
Christian Kong
Respondent:
Michael F Martel
Seams v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2014cv13301
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Seams
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Raymond Marchilli, Phillip Kong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alfonso v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv01334
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alfonso
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Department of Medical and Mental Health Service, Discharge Planner Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Strong v. Jon Ozmint
as 09-8027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES STRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, SC Department of Corrections, BERNARD MCKIE, Kirkland Warden, MICHEL JOSEPH, Prison Guard and others
Kevin Smith v. Jon E. Ozmint
as 09-7540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Royal Blackness, a/k/a Bar None
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. WARD, JAMES E. SLIGH, JR., JOHN LUNDEN and others
Defendant - None:
AEDEC INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, JOHN DOE, ESTHER QUATTLEBAUM and others
Kong v. United States
as 3:2009cv00300
Petitioner:
Lou Kong
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Smith v. Jonathan Ozmint
as 09-6680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN E. OZMINT, ROBERT E. WARD, JAMES E. SLIGH, JR. and others
Defendant - None:
ESTHER QUATTLEBAUM, DUNLAP, J. C. BROWN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
