Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Dixon v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2013cv03161
Petitioner: Wallace L. Dixon, III
Respondent: James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dixon v. Robinson et al
as 5:2013cv01415
Plaintiff: Tavoris L. Dixon
Defendant: Patrick Robinson, David Hughes, Luther Smith and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melvin Dixon v. USA
as 12-3546
Petitioner - Appellant: MELVIN L. DIXON
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. Dixon et al
as 2:2012cv00517
Plaintiff: Jeremiah Smith
Defendant: L. Dixon, A. Monroe and Mr. Booker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. State of Idaho
as 1:2012cv00235
Petitioner: Daniel L Dixon
Respondent: State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIXON v. ZICKEFOOSE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02320
Petitioner: MELVIN L. DIXON
Respondent: DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dixon v. Commonwealth of Virginia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00163
Petitioner: Marcus L. Dixon
Respondent: Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIXON v. THE TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPT. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00277
Defendant: OFFICER BIRCHFIELD, ADAM LOUDERMILK and THE TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPT.
Plaintiff: ROBERT L. DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2417
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stephens v. Winston et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00077
Plaintiff: Decrick Stephens
Defendant: Stevin A. Winston, Frederick L. Gooden, Charles D. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?