Cases 21 - 30 of 272
Johnson v. Warden S. Jansen et al
as 9:2023cv02537
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Johnson
Defendant:
Warden S. Jansen, Warden Phelps, L. Newcombe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
ELLIS v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, GOBBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Kilpatrick et al
as 1:2023cv00081
Defendant:
FNU Erizona, Sean C Kilpatrick, Sgt. E and others
Plaintiff:
Devin Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Yancey et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Christian M. Taylor
Defendant:
Dr. Yancey, W. J. Lassiter and Dr. Brockington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Taylor et al
as 6:2022cv01203
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor
Defendant:
Vladimir Taylor, Brittany Hartley and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. FBOP
as 1:2022cv05949
Petitioner:
Versiah M Taylor
Respondent:
Warden of F B O P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. USA
as 1:2022cv05374
Plaintiff:
Versiah M Taylor
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TAYLOR v. WARDEN OF FBOP, et al.
as 2:2022cv03866
Petitioner:
VERSIAH M. TAYLOR
Respondent:
WARDEN OF FBOP, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Taylor v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv22789
Defendant:
Versiah M. Taylor and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Taylor v. Taylor et al
as 4:2022cv02827
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor
Defendant:
Vladimir Taylor, Sgt Brittany Hartley and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
