Cases 21 - 30 of 114
Moore v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2020cv01418
Plaintiff:
Randy Michael Ki'heem Moore
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Blackburn et al
as 1:2020cv00018
Defendant:
Clinton J. Morgan, Melissa Roberge, Rob Mcguire and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Alexander Avery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gandy v. Turner et al
as 3:2020cv00230
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Gandy
Defendant:
Tom S. Lee, David Turner and Michael C. Moore
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ernest Miller v. Michael R. Moore et al
as 2:2020cv02683
Plaintiff:
Ernest Miller and Ernest G. Logan
Defendant:
Lauren Rauch, Johnny Duran, Michael R. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Lorain County Court of Common Pleas, et al.
as 1:2019cv02769
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Moore
Defendant:
State of Ohio and Lorain County Court of Common Pleas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Rothgery
as 1:2019cv02722
Petitioner:
Michael B. Moore
Respondent:
Judge Rothgery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Otis Michael Thomas v. Sergeant Michael Mattox et al
as 2:2019cv07560
Defendant:
Frederick W. Jackson, Police Officer James Lewis, Police Officer Kelly Sandell and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Michael Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenwood v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv00598
Respondent:
Robert L. Johnson and Michael C. Moore
Petitioner:
Gregory Greenwood
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Davis
as 4:2018cv03354
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Moore
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Moore v. Norris Jackson, et al
as 18-40756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
NORRIS D. JACKSON, Senior Warden of the Beto I Unit, BRYAN COLLIER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, JENNIFER COSTLOW, Registered Nurse - University of Texas Medical Branch and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
