Cases 21 - 30 of 388
Davis v. Goldsmith et al
as 9:2023cv03059
Plaintiff:
Rev Thomas Louis Davis, Rev. Thomas L. Davis and Thomas L Davis
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Sherrif Officer Christian D. Anderson, Carmen T. Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Steve Riddick v. C. Mullens
as 23-6636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE RIDDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O C. MULLENS, UNIT MANAGER LARRY COLLINS, SGT. B. BARNETTE and others
Celestin v. Avery et al
as 3:2023cv03217
Plaintiff:
James Celestin
Defendant:
Kylie Avery and Serena Mullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Mullens
as 7:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
C/O Mullens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Watkins v. Perner et al
as 1:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mullen Watkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Perner and J. Munoz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PATTON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv00879
Plaintiff:
SHANE PATTON
Defendant:
KRISTINE REAGLE, JOHN GALIPEAU, ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steve Riddick v. C. Mickles
as 23-6477
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE RIDDICK, a/k/a Steven Riddick
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O C. MICKLES, C/O J. BOYD, C/O J. GILBERT and others
Cooper v. Mullens
as 2:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Mullens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Peasley v. M. Spearman, et al
as 23-15471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SCOTT PEASLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Warden, D. BRIGHT, Chief Medical Officer, ZAHED AHMED, Doctor and others
Smith v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Karl Smith
Defendant:
Montana Department of Corrections, Montana State Prison, Brian Gootkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
