Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Odem v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2020cv00230
Petitioner:
Benny Odem, Jr
Respondent:
John Lopez and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christine v. Western Missouri Correctional Center et al
as 5:2020cv06151
Plaintiff:
Earl Dennis Christine
Defendant:
Richards, Asby, Chris Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate et al v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00558
Plaintiff:
Ceclia Tate
Defendant:
Aundrea Culcalger, Does 1-100, Correctional Officers Unnamed, 1-100, Jane and John Does, Wendy Kelley and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Jiles, Jr, Elijah McAlister, A Biddings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odem v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00561
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Aundrea Culcalger, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Odem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purcell v. Odem et al
as 1:2020cv00101
Plaintiff:
Scott Purcell and Scott M. Crowley
Defendant:
Babara Odem and Melissa Plunkett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odem v. Odom et al
as 1:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Frances M Odom, Samantha K Sullivan and Kelly M Brown
Plaintiff:
Benny Odem, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odem v. LNU et al
as 1:2020cv00041
Defendant:
Jarvis O Johnson, Stanley Baldwin and FNU LNU
Plaintiff:
Benny Odem, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noyola v. Stiles et al
as 2:2019cv00092
Plaintiff:
Emilio Noyola
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Stiles, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. MARTOCCIA et al
as 1:2018cv02355
Plaintiff:
LOWELL B. SMITH
Defendant:
GREEN, ODEM, JOHN MARTOCCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyan v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv01485
Defendant:
Captain John Doe One, PA-C Nicole Odem, Dr. Scott Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Dalmer Lee Reyan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
