Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Bates v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Bates
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Centurion of Mississippi, Inc., Marshall Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliphant v. Davis
as 9:2016cv00122
Petitioner:
Vertice Oliphant
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oliphant v. Davis. DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 4:2016cv01872
Petitioner:
Vertice Oliphant
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oliphant v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2016cv14220
Plaintiff:
Rashad Oliphant
Defendant:
Secretary,Florida Department of Corrections , Jimmie Reese , Walter Soy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Oliphant v. United States of America
as 5:2015cv00224
Petitioner:
Christopher Lynn Oliphant
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CRANE v. FORT et al
as 5:2015cv00345
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M CRANE, JR
Defendant:
KARL FORT, CELEND JAMES, STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliphant v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2015cv80937
Plaintiff:
Rashad Oliphant
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Guzman, Scopatti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doxley v. Newton County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2015cv05066
Plaintiff:
Damien Duane Doxley
Defendant:
Trevor Williams, Hayes, Alicia Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Binford v. McCrillis et al
as 2:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
Timothy Binford
Defendant:
Shannon McCrillis, John R Oliphant, Harold J Whapeles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliphant v. Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv01130
Plaintiff:
Rashad Sherife Oliphant
Defendant:
Florida Department Of Corrections, Monroe Barnes, D. Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
