Cases 21 - 30 of 40,146
Walker v. Hudson et al
as 5:2024cv03087
Plaintiff:
Derrick S. Walker
Defendant:
D. Hudson, (fnu) Walker, (fnu) Sargent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. NEEL et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
SHAQUON R JOHNSON
Defendant:
J NEEL, E MANNERS, S GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diarra v. Biden
as 1:2024cv02429
Petitioner:
Moussa U'nra Diarra
Respondent:
U. S. President Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Lindsey v. Shane Heiser, et al
as 24-1950
Plaintiff:
DAVID S. LINDSEY
Defendant:
SHANE HEISER, NATHAN REBLIN, JOSHUA RICHTER and others
(PC) Cano v. Salmonson et al
as 2:2024cv01568
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Cano
Defendant:
S. Salmonson, Figueroa-Price and Appel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez Cruz v. Green et al
as 6:2024cv01009
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz
Defendant:
Sherea Green, M. Williams, Pondon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. All 7 continents et al
as 4:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Defendant:
All 7 continents, Mas-Govt., MD Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Milam et al
as 2:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Brent Tyler Kelly
Defendant:
J. L. Milam, Daniel P. White, A. W. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BURNETT v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
ANDREW S. BURNETT
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guevara v. Rowe
as 5:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Rogelio Guevara
Respondent:
Kelly S. Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
