Cases 21 - 30 of 161
Haislip v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv01498
Plaintiff:
Daymon L. Haislip
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, Tom Watson, Lori Shuler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyrice Hill v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 22-3557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRICE HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, J. TRACEY SNIDERHAN, KAYLA LUCAS and others
Shuler v. Bowman
as 4:2022cv00140
Petitioner:
Melodie Shuler
Respondent:
Sheriff William Bowman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Shuler v. Bowman et al
as 4:2022cv00128
Defendant:
Detective Brandt, Sheriff William Bowman, Captain J. McEady and others
Plaintiff:
Melodie Shuler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carthen v. LaFave et al
as 7:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Tremane D. Carthen
Defendant:
Lt. LaFave, Lt. Bellamy, Lt. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ROBINSON v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ROBINSON, JR.
Defendant:
MS. S. WILLIAMS, MR. HON BARRIER and MR. SHULER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Rose, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 22-6218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD ROSE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, HILL-FINKLEA DETENTION CENTER and others
JOHNSON v. SHULER et al
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ALLAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
J SHULER, K PEARSON, MERCER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Tyrice Hill
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, J. Tracey Sniderhan, Kayla Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shuler v. Mansfield et al
as 3:2021cv05713
Plaintiff:
Joshua Issiah Shuler
Defendant:
Lisa Mansfield, Meagan M Foley, Edmund Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
