Cases 21 - 30 of 11,187
Jones v. OGGA Napa Care F.R.J. et al
as 8:2024cv01172
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
OGGA Napa Care F.R.J.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Reed v. Christopher Swanson, et al
as 24-1434
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALLAN REED
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER R. SWANSON, Genesee County Sheriff and BRIAN D. MACMILLAN, Sr. Asst. Pros Atty/FOIA Coordinator
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
ONDISH v. SUPER INTENDENT HAINESWORTH et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. ONDISH, SR.
Respondent:
SUPER INTENDENT HAINESWORTH and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton Sr. v. Porter County Jail
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Walton Sr.
Defendant:
Porter County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton Sr. v. Porter County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Walton Sr.
Defendant:
Porter County Jail and Quality Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monderen v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
William Stange, Latonia Young-Griffin, Timothy Seabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLaughin v. Mount Morris PD et al
as 6:2024cv06302
Plaintiff:
Casey Joel McLaughin, Sr.
Defendant:
Mount Morris PD, Mathew Roegner, Ronald Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
