Cases 21 - 30 of 105
Jackson v. Brown et al
as 4:2022cv03236
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
Cheryl Shook Brown, District Attorney 174th Court and Judge Hazel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Oregon Department of Corrections Health Services et al
as 3:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
James Thornton
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections Health Services, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Sapp et al
as 3:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Lt. Sapp, Sgt. or Off. Pittman, Sgt. Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Manning et al
as 3:2022cv00503
Plaintiff:
Kenard Graham
Defendant:
Sgt. Manning, Sgt. Shook, Sgt. Lingold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHOOK v. BENTON
as 2:2022cv00002
Petitioner:
DANNY SHOOK
Respondent:
Deputy Warden Benton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHOOK v. BENTON
as 5:2021cv00466
Petitioner:
DANNY SHOOK
Respondent:
WARDEN BENTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phelps v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00985
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Don Davis, Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00123
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wilson v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv00464
Defendant:
Justin Painter, Anthony Fink, Phoenix Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lamont Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hyatt v. State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2021cv00053
Respondent:
Don Gast, Ann Benjamin, Rodney G. Hasty and others
Petitioner:
Terry Alvin Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
