Cases 21 - 30 of 587
Trevino v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01596
Plaintiff:
Bertha Celia Trevino
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennard v. Trevino et al
as 4:2023cv02383
Plaintiff:
Jason Jerome Kennard
Defendant:
Brandon Trevino, Ramon Serrano, Shara Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Cook
as 23-50382
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Vallejo Trevino
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Maurice Cook, Ms. P. O'Grady, Lieutenant FNU Hanna and others
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Trevino v. Covello
as 1:2023cv00441
Petitioner:
Robert Trevino
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trevino v. Dotson et al
as 3:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
E. Dotson, T. Ross, S. Newcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. McLane, et al
as 5:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Respondent:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trevino-Alvarez v. Hawkins
as 4:2023cv00910
Petitioner:
Rosalinda Trevino-Alvarez
Respondent:
Warden T. Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Trevino v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00082
Petitioner:
Dean Trevino
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
