Cases 31 - 40 of 455
Johnson
as 1:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
Alexander Dewitt Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dewitt v. Board of Commissioners of Bernalillo County et al
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Christian Dewitt
Defendant:
Board of Commissioners of Bernalillo County, City of Albuquerque, Bernalillo County Metropolitan Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holliman v. Purdy et al
as 2:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Antonio Terrell Holliman
Defendant:
Charlotte Purdy and DeWitt Era Enterprise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Ill Dept. of Corr's et al
as 3:2022cv02872
Plaintiff:
Deonte' Frazier
Defendant:
Ill Dept. of Corr's, Rob Jeffries and Vernon Dewitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Shimek et al
as 2:2022cv01461
Plaintiff:
Kristopher DeWitt Mitchell
Defendant:
Peter Shimek, Jonathan Bussie, Sgt Kohlhoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Racine Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv01409
Plaintiff:
Kristopher DeWitt Mitchell
Defendant:
Racine Police Department, Michael C Seeger, Juan F Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00271
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Odom v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 22-40668
Petitioner / Appellant:
Gary DeWitt Odom
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
DeWitt v. South Polk County Jail
as 8:2022cv02049
Plaintiff:
Timothy K. DeWitt
Defendant:
South Polk County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARLTON v. DEWITT et al
as 5:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARLTON
Defendant:
CERT OFFICER DEWITT, UNIT MANAGER WILCOX and GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
