Cases 31 - 40 of 334
Black v. Harris et al
as 5:2023ct03248
Plaintiff:
Martinez Orlandis Black
Defendant:
Amanda Harris, Ronnie Chavis, Teon Blue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neasbitt v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00257
Petitioner:
Russell E. Neasbitt
Respondent:
Christie Quick, Greg Breslin and Wallace Coppedge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ards v. Judge In the 183rd District Court Room et al
as 4:2023cv02845
Plaintiff:
Clinton Laru Ards
Defendant:
Judge In the 183rd District Court Room, Mayor Sylvester Turner, Paulette Derousselle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Quick
as 23-6095
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY CASTILLO SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
ANITA TRAMMELL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
(PC) Roberson v. Hickman et al
as 2:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
Clarence Lonnell Roberson
Defendant:
J. Hickman, K. Staley, J. Feltner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Quick
as 23-5075
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC TYRONE BRADFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTE QUICK
QUICK v. NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL
as 1:2023cv00554
Plaintiff:
KENTREAL DESHAWN QUICK
Defendant:
NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. McDaniel et al
as 0:2023cv02872
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric McDaniel, David Timmons, Qiana Quick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hostetter v. Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv00492
Petitioner:
Tyler Hostetter
Respondent:
Oklahoma and Christie Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salley v. Capra et al
as 1:2023cv04566
Plaintiff:
Sean Salley
Defendant:
Michael Capra, Mr. Thorpe, C. Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
