Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Enriquez v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2015cv03072
Plaintiff:
Davey Enriquez
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Christopher S. Lacox, E. Oaks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. King et al
as 4:2015cv02082
Plaintiff:
Danny W Jackson
Defendant:
Jimmy B King , South Carolina Department of Public Safety , Kievers L Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Standard
as 1:2015cv01139
Plaintiff:
Joseph W Jackson
Defendant:
Jeff Standard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Bartell et al
as 4:2015cv00695
Plaintiff:
Nathanael L Reynolds
Defendant:
John H Bartell, Jr, Investigator Kennedy and W Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Corizon et al
as 1:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
Jim Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Corizon, Ian Wallace, George A. Lombardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cox et al
as 2:2014cv01326
Defendant:
Joseph Abrams, M. Adams, M. Awedainani and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. City of Selma et al
as 2:2013cv00260
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Green
Defendant:
City of Selma , State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Thaler
as 6:2012cv00299
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Amos W. Jackson
Respondent:
Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Superintendent
as 3:2012cv00605
Petitioner:
Nathaniel C W Jackson
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Superintendent
as 3:2012cv00604
Petitioner:
Nathaniel C W Jackson
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
