Cases 31 - 40 of 1,019
Robinson v. Peete et al
as 9:2024cv80026
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Robinson
Defendant:
Sergeant Jermesha Peete, Sergeant Patrick Karwoski, Sheriff Ric L. Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. USA
as 4:2023cv01233
Petitioner:
Alfonso Butler, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Nunez v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv05347
Petitioner:
Luis Alfonso Nunez
Respondent:
Warden S. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Guadiana v. Reeves et al
as 1:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Guadiana
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Burl Cain, Bran Huffman and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jermaine Harmon v. Anthony Rhodes, et al
as 23-13805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMAINE ALFONSO HARMON
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY W. RHODES, CODY BENSLAY, ERIC HENKEL and others
Garcia v. Wexford Health Services et al
as 3:2023cv03561
Plaintiff:
Enrique Garcia
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, David Alfonso and Ashley Oneil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxey v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03491
Plaintiff:
LaMarr Maxey
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Alfonso C David, Dr Burrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Call et al
as 2:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Hardy
Defendant:
Lieutenant Call, Officer Wilmouth and Officer Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker-Hernandez v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Barker-Hernandez
Defendant:
F Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TORRES ALVAREZ v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00215
Petitioner:
ALFONSO TORRES ALVAREZ
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
