Cases 31 - 40 of 9,807
Thompson v. Michigan, State of
as 2:2024cv11426
Petitioner:
Misty Leann Thompson
Respondent:
Michigan, State of
HENDERSON et al v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv02290
Plaintiff:
MALIKA HENDERSON, KHALIL HAMMOND, DAVID THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Thompson et al
as 3:2024cv01311
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Walker
Defendant:
Lowell Thompson, Will Thompson, Andrew Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thompson
Defendant:
Martin, Moore, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Osborn Correctional
as 3:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
Marteaste Monkinzy Thompson
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EUCEDA-CANALES v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06415
Petitioner:
MELVIN EUCEDA-CANALES
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BARKER v. R. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06432
Petitioner:
BRANDON EARL BARKER
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRYANT v. R. THOMPSON, WARDEN
as 1:2024cv06417
Petitioner:
RONNIE L. BRYANT
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. Douglas County Corrections et al
as 8:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Jacob A. Thompson, Sr.
Defendant:
Douglas County Corrections, Michael Myers, Lt. Sanduski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Thompson v. Lynch
as 1:2024cv00611
Petitioner:
DeWayne Thompson
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
