Cases 31 - 40 of 2,195
Burke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00527
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke, Bryan v. United States Of America
as 0:2024cv60222
Plaintiff:
Bryan David Burke
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BURK v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. BURK
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE and TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujano v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Adam Anthony Lujano
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Edward Villazobos, Dominique Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Foust et al
as 5:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Dennis Foust, Judge Jaminson, Shannon Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Burk
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Johnny-Lee Preston Burk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BURKS v. MCWILLIAMS et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JAMAAL BURKS
Defendant:
LASQUBIA MCWILLIAMS, DEBBIE JONES, KELLEY WATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Collier et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gary Smith
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Warden Michael Feazell, Assistant Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURK v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL A. BURK
Defendant:
DR LITTLE, PA NICHOLSON, MS FAVALORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. WEST et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Defendant:
Lieutenant ADRIAN WEST, Warden LETITIA BURKS, ANTHONY ANTONIO HAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
