Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Raleem-X et al v. Ward et al
as 2:2015cv11905
Plaintiff:
Raleem-X, Iesha Northington, Poncietta Earle and others
Defendant:
A. Ward, Kevin Rogers, B. Kamin and others
Morris v. Dixon et al
as 3:2015cv00119
Plaintiff:
Mark Morris
Defendant:
Tami Dixon, Tracy Renae Matheny-Morris, John C Wisner , III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Homan v. Johnson et al
as 4:2014cv00505
Plaintiff:
James Homan
Defendant:
Carl Johnson, Bertha Lowe , Lisa Marler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. Judd et al
as 1:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
David Easley
Defendant:
Dana Judd, Donald Morgan, Kathy Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards #641715 et al v. Snyder et al
as 1:2014cv00084
Plaintiff:
Kyle B. Richards #641715 and Michael Lutz #371124
Defendant:
Rick Snyder, Daniel Heyns, Unknown Sherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colbert v. El Paso Psychiatric Center et al
as 3:2014cv00003
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Aeschbach, El Paso Psychiatric Center, Dr. Abby Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Bertha Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Richards et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2013cv14924
Plaintiff:
Kyle Richards and Michael Lutz
Defendant:
Rick Snyder, Daniel Heyns, Sherry and others
Colbert v. Wiles et al
as 3:2013cv00354
Petitioner:
Bertha Colbert
Respondent:
The State of Texas District Court, The State of Texas Judicial System and Richard Wiles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vincent Bailey v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 13-60715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT TITO BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EMMITT L. SPARKMAN, Deputy Commissioner, BERTHA SPIVEY, STG Coordinator and others
Colbert v. Wiles
as 3:2013cv00274
Petitioner:
Bertha Colbert
Respondent:
Richard Wiles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
