Cases 31 - 40 of 591
Smith v. Burgos et al
as 5:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Kquano C. Smith
Defendant:
A. Burgos, R. Maleske and Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantrell v. Scofild et al
as 2:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Shane Cantrell
Defendant:
Scofild, M Jackson, D Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reavis v. Brown et al
as 3:2022cv00819
Plaintiff:
Rodriguez Jermaine Reavis
Defendant:
Officer Travis Brown, C. Smith, Ceo Madison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boure v. Redington et al
as 2:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Boure
Defendant:
Daniel Redington, Lacey Twellman, Rebecca Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Smith
as 1:2022cv04240
Petitioner:
John A. Hunter
Respondent:
Warden C. Smith and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C SMITH
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silliman v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv02412
Plaintiff:
Joseph Howard Silliman
Defendant:
Nathan C. Smith and Jesse Vicente
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv01042
Petitioner:
Derek Smith and Derek C. Smith
Respondent:
Ricky Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00339
Petitioner:
DEREK SMITH and DEREK C SMITH
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drake v. Adult Parole Authority et al
as 1:2022cv01529
Plaintiff:
Marcus Drake
Defendant:
Adult Parole Authority, Warden A. C. Smith and Parole Officer Danielle Lesko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
