Cases 31 - 40 of 125
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv02231
Defendant:
SUPT. FERGUSON, SUPT. GILMORE, DEPUTY DIALASANDRO and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. GILLMORE et al
as 2:2019cv00397
Defendant:
AUSTIN, JOHNSON, CARO and others
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS A. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CARO v. Department of Corrections
as 2:2019at00161
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
CESAR ADOLFO CARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(HC) Caro v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2019cv00373
Petitioner:
Cesar Adolfo Caro
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and M. Eliot Spearman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jose Caro v. LA County Sheriff's Department
as 2:2018cv10612
Plaintiff:
Jose Caro
Defendant:
LA County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01685
Defendant:
DR. LUCAS MALISHCHAK, JOHN BURT, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Robles v. Mendez et al
as 2:2018cv02979
Defendant:
Unknown Hinojos, Eduardo Rubacalua, Andrew Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Olegario Robles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNIDER v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00735
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, NEDRA GREGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SNIDER v. WITTIG et al
as 2:2018cv00703
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Defendant:
ROBERT WITTIG, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, SHELLY MANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
PRICE v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
MAURICE M. PRICE
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, DAN CARO, COWAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
