Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Irvin v. Mr. Irvin Enterprises et al
as 1:2015cv02444
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Mr. Irvin Enterprises, Brian Kemp, Fulton County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magluta v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv00318
Plaintiff:
Salvador Magluta
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Vanec, Theresa Montoya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiBartolo v. Cruze et al
as 6:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
Steven Joseph DiBartolo
Defendant:
Michael Cruze, Ebony O. Harvey, Milten Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiBartolo v. Cruze et al
as 5:2014cv00103
Plaintiff:
Steven Joseph DiBartolo
Defendant:
Michael Cruze, Ebony O. Harvey, Milten Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2013cv00586
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, Unknown Collins, Jimmy Cruze and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRISTOW v. WARDEN
as 2:2013cv00230
Plaintiff:
LONNY BRISTOW
Defendant:
J. F. CARAWAY, CRUZE, PAUL M. LAIRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe v. Poret et al
as 3:2013cv00376
Defendant:
Cyndia Aquilina, James Cruze, Troy Poret and others
Interested Party:
William Kline
Plaintiff:
Billy Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruze v. Warner et al
as 3:2013cv05220
Plaintiff:
Schawn James Cruze
Defendant:
Bernie Warner , Eldon Vail , Tim Thrasher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemons v. Spradlin et al
as 7:2009cv00143
Plaintiff:
Shelby Lemons
Defendant:
D. Spradlin, P. Cruze, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clarence Winfrey v. Cain, et al
as 09-30169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE WINFREY
Defendant - Appellee:
N BURL CAIN, JAMES CRUZE, JR., CASSANDRA TEMPLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
