Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,810
Marion Chapman v. Clay Stanton, et al
as 24-2047
Plaintiff: Marion M. Chapman
Defendant: Jalilah Otto, Judge, Theresa Crayon and Clay Stanton, Warden
CHAPMAN v. STATE OF GEORGIA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00150
Petitioner: YAQUAN LAVETT SANDY CHAPMAN
Respondent: STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Annabel, II v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1425
Defendant: ASSISTANT DEPUTY WARDEN MCKINNEY, official and personal capacity, NORBERT FRONCZAK, Law Librarian, official and personal capacity, JEFF TANNER, Warden, official and personal capacity, named as J. Tanner and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Shawn Otte v. Arron Wilson, et al
as 24-1992
Plaintiff: Shawn Otte
Defendant: Arron Wilson, Chandra Bankhead, Michael Fusselman and others
Chapman v. Leeds
as 1:2024cv01106
Petitioner: Billie Joe Chapman
Respondent: Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chapman v. USA
as 5:2024cv00243
Petitioner: Michael Jarrell Chapman
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Michaels (PS) et al v. Lepe et al
as 1:2024cv01116
Plaintiff: Thomas Wayne Michaels and Eli Joseph Chapman
Defendant: C. Lepe, Espinosa, S. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guillot v. Wade
as 24-30247
Plaintiff: Dylan Guillot
Defendant: Warden Wade, Asst Warden Dear, Deputy Warden Cupp and others
Chapman v. USA
as 3:2024cv00376
Petitioner: Ishmeel Qyshawn Chapman
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Chapman v. Mnuchin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00179
Petitioner: Josh Chapman
Respondent: Steven Mnuchin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?