Cases 31 - 40 of 552
SWEENEY v. WARDEN
as 3:2022cv00188
Petitioner:
CHARLES EDWARD SWEENEY, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickett #485575 v. Rewerts
as 1:2022cv01081
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Pickett #485575, Jr.
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fraction v. Moorhead Police Department
as 3:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Fraction
Defendant:
Moorhead Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWEENEY v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00178
Petitioner:
CHARLES EDWARD SWEENEY, JR.
Respondent:
DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashford v. Woods
as 2:2022cv01088
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Ashford
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ashford v. Woods
as 4:2022cv01088
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Ashford
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Luckett v. People of State of California
as 4:2022cv06634
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Luckett
Respondent:
People of State of California
Defendant:
Landon Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Gladieux et al
as 1:2022cv00345
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Thomas
Defendant:
David J. Gladieux, Thomas C. Henry, Allen County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skipp v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00859
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Skipp
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ashford v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2022cv00827
Plaintiff:
Charles Ashford and Charles Edward Ashford
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
