Cases 31 - 40 of 43
HOLMES v. DEVITO et al
as 2:2011cv03329
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. HOLMES
Defendant:
C.O. DEVITO, C.O. COMPRETTO, ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Schriff et al
as 9:2011cv00531
Plaintiff:
Angelo Johnson
Defendant:
Michael A. Schriff, William DeVito, Thomas Loughern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction et al
as 2:2011cv00326
Plaintiff:
James Mobley
Defendant:
State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Warden Madison Correctional Institution, Deputy Warden Madison Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTEAD v. MEE et al
as 2:2011cv01740
Plaintiff:
COREY M. ARMSTEAD
Defendant:
WILLIAM EGAN, DOMINICK AURIEMMA, PASQUALE CAPOZZOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Bellamy et al
as 6:2009cv06114
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Karen Bellamy, George D. Struebec, Ryan English and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Abreu v. Bellamy et al
as 1:2009cv01620
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Karen Bellamy, George D. Struebec, Ryan English and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fowlkes v. St. Peters et al
as 1:2009cv10260
Plaintiff:
Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant:
St. Peters, Murphy, Forrest and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Becker v. Beightler, et al
as 08-1873
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAN BECKER
Respondent - Appellee:
MARGARET BEIGHTLER, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, DAVID H. SOUTER and others
Becker v. Blightler et al
as 1:2008fp00185
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Defendant:
Margaret Blightler, Michael B. Mukasey, David H. Souter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Denny v. Warren et al
as 1:2008cv01244
Plaintiff:
David William Denny, II
Defendant:
Neil Warren, Devito, Unknown Name and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
