Cases 31 - 40 of 3,616
Davenport v. Klang et al
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee Davenport
Defendant:
Rodney Klang, Rebecca Tervonen, Sgt Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Sukowaty
as 2:2023cv01694
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee Davenport
Defendant:
Laura C Sukowaty, Alana Acker and Larry Fuchs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Abbett et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Riley
Defendant:
Jimmy Abbett, Blake Jennings, Lt. Naile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWMAN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
DUSTY L BOWMAN
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, MR RICHARD COMERFORD, GARY HEWETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber v. State of Louisiana
as 23-30865
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Lee Barber
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, Samuel C. D'Aquilla, Fred Allen and others
Timothy Honea v. Fred Webb
as 23-7276
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ALLEN HONEA
Defendant:
FRED WEBB, Attorney, sued in their individual and official capacities, BOB BOYKIN, Private Investigator, sued in their individual and official capacities, ROBERT SHARPE, Director of Capital Defender Office, sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Fred Murphy v. Mike Slagle
as 23-7303
Petitioner:
FRED MURPHY
Respondent:
MIKE SLAGLE, Warden and JOSHUA STEIN
(PC) Dorton v. Tostonie, et al.
as 1:2023cv01784
Plaintiff:
Fred Dorton
Defendant:
Steve Tostonie, J Kimes, D. Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fred Jay Jackson v. Karim Rasheed
as 2:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Fred Jay Jackson
Defendant:
Karim Rasheed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jackson v. Rasheed
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Fred Jay Jackson
Defendant:
Karim Rasheed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
