Cases 31 - 40 of 3,344
Keith Cureton, Jr. v. John Gray
as 24-6282
Plaintiff:
KEITH CURETON, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN R. GRAY, MARK FLEMMINGS, MONICA BOND and others
CONYERS v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CONYERS
Defendant:
WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN GRAHAM, CAPTAIN HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredrick Graham v. Abbey O'Brien, et al
as 24-1295
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
Abbey O'Brien, Unknown Probation Officer #1, Unknown Probation Officer #2 and others
Graham v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Tommy James Graham, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Artrip, Thompson, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kassal v. Stromberg et al
as 1:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Brian Kassal
Defendant:
Paul Stromberg, Jason Lengerich, Troy Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Unknown Defendants
as 5:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Graham
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
James Martin Graham
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GRAHAM v. FORRESTER et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
DESMOND LAMAR GRAHAM, JR
Defendant:
KAREN FORRESTER, EMANUAL HERNANDEZ-PEREZ and CENTURION OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaspie v. Flory et al
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neal Glaspie
Defendant:
Craig Flory, S Sprabery, FNU Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron Flemons v. Emma Hatchett, et al
as 24-1031
Plaintiff:
Aaron Anthony Flemons
Defendant:
Emma Hatchett, Health Services Administrator, Tracy Bennett, APRN, Medical Care Provider, Hays, Medical Care Provider and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
