Cases 31 - 40 of 2,333
Fernandez v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv01769
Plaintiff:
George A Fernandez
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cook County Jail Director, Hollis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory v. Spt. Municipal et al
as 1:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lamar Gregory
Defendant:
Spt. Municipal, Sheriff Chuck F. Wright, Major Leso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Sabillon et al
as 4:2024cv10019
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Edwin Sabillon and Samuel Carpentar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelnutt v. McLaughlin et al
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Keneth Kaylon Shelnutt
Defendant:
Josh McLaughlin, Brady Aderholt, Gray West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mouring v. Daniels et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Layne Mouring
Defendant:
Captain Daniels, Captain Jones, Lieutenant Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Duffield Facility S.W.V.R.J.A. et al
as 7:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith
Defendant:
Duffield Facility S.W.V.R.J.A., 0.0469 Captain Hayes and 0.0560 Lt. Hailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. USA
as 5:2024cv06031
Petitioner:
Caleb Dean Hayes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hayes v. Clarke
as 1:2024cv00273
Petitioner:
Mark Hayes
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Carpentar et al
as 4:2024cv10014
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
S. Carpentar and J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Henry et al.
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Patrick Russell, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Christopher Henry, Officer Riee, Nurse Amanda Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
