Cases 31 - 40 of 115
Blackmer v. Clinton
as 1:2015fp00500
Plaintiff:
Paul Blackmer
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2015cv01498
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, ROBERT CESSOR, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Meyer v. Steel et al
as 1:2015cv01002
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, John Kerry, Barack Obama and others
Plaintiff:
Charlane Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. HARPER et al
as 1:2015cv01780
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, ROBERT CESSOR, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lagana v. San Mateo County Sheriff et al
as 4:2015cv04696
Plaintiff:
Joseph Victor Lagana
Defendant:
San Mateo County Sheriff, Daly City Police Department, San Mateo County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luevano v. Clinton, et al
as 15-1230
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAIME LUEVANO
Respondent - Appellee:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, Ex Secretary of State, U.S. TEXAS JUDGES, High Rank Official, et al., CONGRESS OFFICIALS and others
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 2:2015cv01163
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luevano v. Clinton, et al
as 15-1024
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAIME LUEVANO
Respondent - Appellee:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, Ex Secretary of State, U.S. TEXAS JUDGES, High Rank Official, et al. and CONGRESS OFFICIALS
Luevano v. Clinton et al
as 1:2014cv03493
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Respondent:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, U.S. Texas Judges, Congress Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bayard v. Clinton et al
as 4:2014cv00576
Plaintiff:
Antwon Maurice Bayard
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Jacquline Kennedy, Janet Reno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
