Cases 31 - 40 of 3,220
Bonilla v. Hamilton
as 4:2024cv01711
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owes v. Hamilton C.I. Annex et al
as 3:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
John Owes
Defendant:
Hamilton C.I. Annex and Paul Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fruzzetti v. Town Counsel Chair, et al
as 24-1247
Plaintiff:
LEE FRUZZETTI
Defendant:
TOWN COUNSEL CHAIR, Town of Plymouth, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DANIEL PERRY, Easton Police Detective and others
Austin Hamilton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10790
Petitioner:
AUSTIN ISAAC HAMILTON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Hamilton v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2024cv00449
Petitioner:
Barry Lee Hamilton
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Pierre Quaran Hamilton
Defendant:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. DPSCS
as 1:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Jahi Rashad Hamilton
Defendant:
DPSCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
David Hamilton v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10716
Petitioner:
DAVID C. HAMILTON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Gordon v. Weems et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gordon
Defendant:
Ronnie Weems, J. Manning, Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Quality Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Montel Johnson
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Health Care, Hamilton County Jail and Hamilton County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
