Cases 31 - 40 of 3,043
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BROWN v. ODDO et al
as 2:2024cv00226
Petitioner:
MARVIN LYLE BROWN
Respondent:
WARDEN LEMAR ODDO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ROJAS v. FBOP et al
as 1:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
EDGAR ROJAS
Defendant:
FBOP, FCI FORT DIX WARDEN and DHS DEPARMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Wray
as 24-10122
Plaintiff:
Fred Gonzales
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, Director, FBI, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and William Burns, Director, CIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brown v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al.
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Derek William Brown
Defendant:
The Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Warden of Connally Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
