Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 31,031
Abir Ali v. Esker Tatum
as 24-6527
Plaintiff: ABIR ALI
Defendant: ESKER TATUM, Warden and JOHN DOE
Matthew Budney v. Nurse Julie
as 24-6529
Plaintiff: MATTHEW BUDNEY
Defendant: NURSE JULIE, NURSE ASHLEY, SHERIFF REYNOLDS, Laurens County and others
Kevin Giles v. Christopher Swanson, et al
as 24-1473
Plaintiff: KEVIN LA'VON GILES
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER R. SWANSON, Sheriff, KAY [UNKNOWN], Nurse, LIZ [UNKNOWN], Nurse and others
Garrison v. John Does and Jane Does Byrd Unit
as 4:2024cv02034
Plaintiff: Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant: John Does and Jane Does Byrd Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesolek v. Erie County Holding Center et al
as 6:2024cv06340
Plaintiff: Justin Wesolek
Defendant: Erie County Holding Center, Eric County Sheriff Department, Kathy Hochul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2024cv00906
Plaintiff: AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant: ARAMARK, GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. Czeremcha et al
as 3:2024cv00938
Plaintiff: James Pena
Defendant: Czeremcha, Nick Rodriguez, Zack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredricks v. May et al
as 9:2024cv00719
Plaintiff: Nigel Fredricks and Nigel Fredericks
Defendant: C. May and John Doe Correction Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. John Does and Janes Does Mark W. Michael Unit
as 6:2024cv00192
Plaintiff: Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant: John Does and Janes Does Mark W. Michael Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. John Does and Janes Does, Coffield Unit
as 6:2024cv00193
Plaintiff: Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant: John Does and Janes Does, Coffield Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?