Cases 31 - 40 of 31,052
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, The Illinois Attorney Generals Office, The Inspector General of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shockley v. Sweet et al
as 4:2024cv11462
Plaintiff:
Clifton D. Shockley
Defendant:
Sweet, Clemmons, Schirmer and others
Jacobs v. David et al
as 5:2024cv11463
Plaintiff:
William Edwin Jacobs
Defendant:
David, Frangedakis, Branch and others
FLORES v. HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 2:2024cv06674
Plaintiff:
JASON FLORES
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, BECKY SCOTT and OFC. JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Fargo Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Ford
Defendant:
Fargo Police Department, Kara Schmitz Olson, Monty Grant Mertz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gorbey v. Doe et al
as 6:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey, Tsunami Khan and Chief Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe, Mr. Stoval, Tony Shult and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Woods v. DOE et al
as 6:2024cv06347
Plaintiff:
Lumumba Woods
Defendant:
Superintendent JOHN DOE, Dep. Kelly, Dsp K VanNote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pacheco v. Markeke et al
as 5:2024ct03140
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Officer Markeke, Sergeant Hall, Lieutenant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Adams et al
as 5:2024cv03314
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Walker and Jeffrey Walker
Defendant:
Chief Adams, Sgt. Callaway, Lt. Clasal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Banks
Defendant:
M. Smith, Duffy, Ford Transit Van Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
