Cases 31 - 40 of 1,893
Justice v. Solomon et al
as 3:2023cv02135
Petitioner:
Bilal Justice
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Solomon and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv03827
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Paul Schnell and Jo Ann Erickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vick v. Butts
as 4:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Clifford Vick
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Butts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Ralston et al
as 1:2023cv02029
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Woods
Defendant:
George Ralston, Paula Price, Tracie Parkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Precythe et al
as 2:2023cv04223
Plaintiff:
Dairian Eugene Stanley
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Travis Terry, Doris Falkenrath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Walters et al
as 5:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Darren Walters, Katrina White, Derek Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moran v. Jackson County
as 1:2023cv01777
Petitioner:
Angela Jo Boorman and Angela Jo Moran
Respondent:
Jackson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bair v. SCI-Rockview et al
as 3:2023cv01860
Plaintiff:
Ramaj Bair
Defendant:
SCI-Rockview, Bobbi Jo Salamon and Food Services/Culinary Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEBEDE v. SALAMON, et al
as 5:2023cv04370
Petitioner:
EMRU KEBEDE
Respondent:
BOBBI JO SALAMON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Desouze v. Osteen et al
as 4:2023cv04198
Plaintiff:
Neville Ambrose Desouze
Defendant:
Joel Osteen, Victoria Osteen, Sara Jo Parnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
