Cases 31 - 40 of 9,029
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6428
Plaintiff:
JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH, a/k/a Robert Gabriel Love, a/k/a Gabriel Alexander Antonio
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Albert St. Clair, Jr. v. DeAngelo Anthony, et al
as 24-11302
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE ST. CLAIR, JR.
Defendant:
DEANGELO M. ANTHONY, DEREK R. GULLEDGE, ERIC STROM and others
Worden v. Gearland et al
as 4:2024cv11191
Plaintiff:
Marc David Worden
Defendant:
Glenn Gearland, T. Blain, Gary Keyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Chadwick Dotson, Director of Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saxon v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Robert Saxon
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. King et al
as 2:2024cv11176
Petitioner:
Carli Carpenter
Respondent:
C. King, Kym Worthy, Patricia Penman and others
Sheppard v. Matushak et al
as 2:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Sheppard and Antonio Decarlo Sheppard, Jr
Defendant:
Lt Anthony Matushak, Jody Perttu, CO Mayor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv04078
Petitioner:
Andre King
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Michael Dobson v. Dr. Thompson
as 24-6403
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOBSON
Defendant:
DR. THOMPSON, HAROLD W. CLARKE, STEVEN HERRICK and others
Perry #775224 v. King
as 1:2024cv00440
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Perry #775224
Respondent:
Chris King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
