Cases 31 - 40 of 178
Yeager v. Widdal et al
as 2:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Duane Robert Yeager
Defendant:
Mitzie Widdal, Kenneth Trivitt, Sgt McGinnis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lunsford v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Deana Lunsford and Douglas Rucker
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Joshua Hyman, Cody Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirkwood v. Benson et al
as 9:2022cv81301
Plaintiff:
Jeremy B. Kirkwood
Defendant:
Andrew Benson, Howard Lunsford, Anthony J. Sala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
TALLEY et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv02328
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY, PENNSYLVANIANS WITH MENTAL ILLNESS and MINORITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
TONY LIONEL LOVE
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, JOSEPH, SANFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAIN v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
DURELL T. CRAIN
Defendant:
SEVIER, FRENCH, PAIGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Roger Lunsford
as 22-6079
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGER KEITH LUNSFORD
ROSE v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ROSE
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ALSIP, STAMPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GADDIS v. LAUGHLIN et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
DEREK RYAN GADDIS
Defendant:
JOEY LAUGHLIN, LEONARD BAKER, ZACK JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Manago v. Santoro et al
as 1:2021cv01616
Plaintiff:
Stewart Manago
Defendant:
Kelly Santoro, Kevin Hixon, R. Philpott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
