Cases 31 - 40 of 793
Brumfield vs Howard, et al
as 1:2023cv00112
Petitioner:
Marquis Dushan Brumfield
Respondent:
Richard Howard, Chris Corsbie, Chris Clapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Omari Mason v. McKelvin #81
as 23-7201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMARI KEISAUN MASON
Defendant / Appellee:
MCKELVIN #81, Sergeant and JONES, Correctional Officer
Defendant:
KEVIN TALLEY, Lieutenant, FRANK MACK, Major, LARRY LEABOUGH, Superintendent and others
Mitchell v. USA
as 2:2023cv00612
Petitioner:
Andre Marquis Mitchell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04480
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marquis Heard v. Scott Harris
as 23-5272
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marquis Deron Heard
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott Harris, Official Capacity
Ware v. Bishop et al
as 1:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Marquis Deyshaun Ware
Defendant:
Ricky Bishop, Tim Trawick and T. Polluck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. James T. Vaughn Correctional Center et al
as 1:2023cv01279
Plaintiff:
Marquis Mason
Defendant:
James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, VitalCore Health Strategies and Michael Records
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. TDCJ et al
as 1:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
Kernelius Marquis Shepherd, Sr.
Defendant:
TDCJ and UTMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Judge et al
as 5:2023ct03306
Plaintiff:
Marquis D. Williams
Defendant:
Warden Judge and Correctional Officer Bacosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
