Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Ritter v. Sevier et al
as 3:2017cv00608
Plaintiff:
William Donald Ritter
Defendant:
Mark Sevier, Lovins, Womack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Snelling v. Kenneth Romanowski, et al
as 16-2233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS R. SNELLING
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH ROMANOWSKI, Warden, GEORGE STEPHENSON, Warden, MERRIANNE WEBERG, Lt. and others
Bruce Bandel v. Louis Borjon et al
as 2:2014cv09926
Defendant:
Ms. Andrade, Mr. Banuelos, Mr. Bautista and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Bandel
Nathaniel Singleton v. Mr. Nelson
as 14-7139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL SINGLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
FOOD SERVICE OFFICER MR. NELSON, FOOD SERVICE MR. TAYLOR, FOOD SERVICE MR. CRAZE and others
Welton v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv13141
Plaintiff:
Byron Jermaine Welton
Defendant:
United States of America, James Jarret, Mr. Padula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Majette et al
as 2:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Leonard Bell
Defendant:
Offender Majette, F. Best and Mrs. Taylor
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Nathaniel Singleton v. Mr. Nelson
as 14-6103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL SINGLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
FOOD SERVICE OFFICER MR. NELSON, FOOD SERVICE MR. TAYLOR, FOOD SERVICE MR. CRAZE and others
Lynn v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv04735
Plaintiff:
Sean Carey Lynn
Defendant:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID, Mr. Summers, Ms. Angie Ricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Lane et al
as 3:2013cv00814
Plaintiff:
Arthur G Boyd
Defendant:
David Lane, Garriup Construction, Skillman Construction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Hatchett et al
as 2:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Robert Taylor Austin
Defendant:
Ms. Hatchett, Mr. Jones, Mr. Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
