Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Gilbert v. United States Attorney General et al
as 0:2016cv60443
Plaintiff:
Craig Ivan Gilbert
Defendant:
United States Attorney General , Federal Bureau Investigations , Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Taylor v. National Security Agency
as 16-6288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
Soto v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2016cv00820
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency and South Beach Pyschiatric Center
Petitioner:
Alexander Anthony Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Credico v. National Security Agency et al
as 1:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
Justin Credico
Defendant:
National Security Agency and Unknown Agents of NSA TAO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. National Security Agency
as 5:2015ct03225
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Taylor
Defendant:
National Security Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01341
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cota v. Jones & Magnus PLLC et al
as 0:2015cv02089
Plaintiff:
George Frank Cota
Defendant:
Jones & Magnus PLLC, Ryan B. Magnus, Mark F. Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. National Security Agency et al
as 5:2014cv00194
Petitioner:
Sidney Wilson
Respondent:
National Security Agency and Sheriff Webb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. Nett et al
as 5:2014cv00983
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks, Spence Taylor and John Michael
Defendant:
Elizabeth Nett, Ralph Shrader, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
