Cases 31 - 40 of 472
Lopez v. Lee et al
as 4:2023cv03660
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lopez
Defendant:
M. Lee, Hamner, Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDuff v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv11739
Plaintiff:
Richard McDuff
Defendant:
Kristen Jones, Megan Oaks and Coleman
Thompson v. Dreyer et al
as 4:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Thompson
Defendant:
Dreyer, Martin, Officer Oakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Cline et al
as 3:2023cv00188
Defendant:
John Doe, Caleigh Cline, Brandon Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Prentiss Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Markwell et al
as 2:2023cv11067
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carson Smith
Defendant:
Chad E. Markwell, Magen Oaks, Heidi Washington and others
Moore v. Flores et al
as 3:2023cv02065
Plaintiff:
Ryan T. Moore
Defendant:
Flores, Demus, Bloomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Wolf v. Idaho State Board of Correction, et al
as 23-35285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW J.J. WOLF
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTION, DEBRA FIELD, each sued in their individual and official capacities, and their successors in office, DAVID MCCLUSKEY, each sued in their individual and official capacities, and their successors in office and others
Martin v. Live Oak
as 23-40254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Neal Martin
Defendant / Appellee:
Live Oak County Jail, Live Oak County Sheriffs Department, Cara Kay Joiner Barton and others
Demetrius Howard v. Oak Smith
as 5:2023cv00705
Petitioner:
Demetrius Howard
Respondent:
Oak Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
(HC) Gutierrez Jr. v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00712
Petitioner:
Jesus Gutierrez Jr.
Respondent:
Oak Smith and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
