Cases 31 - 40 of 2,327
Preston v. Rewerts et al
as 2:2024cv10701
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Preston
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Cook, Ryhdall and others
Blake v. Jordan et al
as 6:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tony Kent Blake
Defendant:
Suzanne Jordan, Terry Parks, Choctaw County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Howard v. Parks, et al.
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Aylana Olivia Parks, J. Membreno, H. Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Evan Parks
Defendant:
Bob Gualtieri and Pinellas County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01107
Plaintiff:
Janar Parks
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Richard M Johnson, Julie Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custis v. Accomack County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
William Parke Custis
Defendant:
Accomack County Sheriff's Office, Wayne Greer, Donnie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custis v. Exmore Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
William Parke Custis
Defendant:
Exmore Police Department, Adam Zieger, Jonathan Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kyle Parks v. United States
as 24-1412
Petitioner:
Kyle Maurice Parks
Respondent:
United States of America
Hirschbine v. Town of Orchard Park et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hirschbine
Defendant:
Town of Orchard Park, Town of Orchard Park Police Department, Marshall McGraw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
