Cases 31 - 40 of 581
Riddick v. Rose et al
as 7:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
Sgt. J. Rose, C/O T. Neece, C/O H. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GATES v. SMITH et al
as 5:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
MARTAVIOUS GATES
Defendant:
WARDEN T SMITH, HUNT, DOCTOR COWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willie Smith v. Dawn Jones, et al
as 22-16913
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE T. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
DAWN JONES, KELLY LYON, DON ADAMS and others
Smith v. Suthers et al
as 3:2022cv00992
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
John Suthers, f/n/u Elders, f/n//u Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, et al. v. Elpaso County Sheriff Office, et al.
as 3:2022cv00978
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith and M. Shafens
Defendant:
Holder T. Smith, T-Samson Lewis, f/n/u Pallote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emmanuel McGriff El v. Centralize Infraction Bureau
as 22-7384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL LEE MCGRIFF EL
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRALIZE INFRACTION BUREAU, NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Gray v. Batastini et al
as 6:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gray
Defendant:
Ashley B Batastini, FNU Madrano, FNU Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Alexander et al
as 3:2022cv01698
Plaintiff:
Jammie T. Smith
Defendant:
Steve Alexander, Jeffery Wheeler and T. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. Smith
as 22-2816
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ramon Cruz
Respondent / Appellee:
Joseph T. Smith, Superintendent, Shawangunk Correctional Facility
Smith v. Rupert, et al
as 3:2022cv00851
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
f/n/u Rupert, f/n/u Rameren, f/n/u Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
