Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Ernest Singleton v. Hector Alcala, et al
as 16-5005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST WILLIAM SINGLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE POLICE OFFICER HECTOR ALCALA, KSP OFFICER DENNIE S. MABRY, KSP OFFICER TIMOTHY JOE DIALS and others
HUTTON v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2015cv08330
Plaintiff:
TROY A. HUTTON
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, THREE AS OF YET UN-NAMED/UNIDENTIFIED CORRECTIONS OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2015cv02631
Plaintiff:
Un'Tarion Clark
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, Willie Shaw, Boughpon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Parker et al
as 3:2015cv00494
Plaintiff:
Derrick R Woods
Defendant:
Kim Parker, Three Un-Named Investigators, Illinois State's Attorney's Office and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Khem Un
as 15-7383
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KHEM UN, a/k/a Khem Roeutanck Un
Aden v. Somalia Permanent Mission to UN-United Nations
as 3:2015cv00513
Plaintiff:
Mousen Aden
Defendant:
Somalia Permanent Mission to UN-United Nations and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emerson Anderson v. David Less, et al
as 15-3022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMERSON M. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID LESS, HCA, GINA MADDOX, RN/QIC, RON PAWLUS, Inst. Insp. and others
Robert Sango v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 14-1791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT D. SANGO
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director, DUNCAN MACLAREN, Warden and UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Four Un-Named Officers
Anderson v. Less et al
as 1:2013cv01630
Plaintiff:
Emerson M. Anderson
Defendant:
David Less, Gina Maddox, Ron Pawlus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
