Cases 31 - 40 of 365
Solis v. Stancil et al
as 1:2019cv00078
Defendant:
Carl M. Miedich, Munoz, M. A. Stancil and others
Respondent:
Medina
Plaintiff:
Arturo Solis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Bowens v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2019cv00102
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Correctional Health Services, Unknown Party and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jermaine Bowens, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vail v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv11822
Defendant:
New York City Department Of Corrections, The City of New York and Correction Officer Egwu
Plaintiff:
Andrew Vail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byers v. Maricopa County Correctional Health Services, et al
as 2:2018cv04243
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Byers
Defendant:
Maricopa County Correctional Health Services, Unknown Bonne, Maricopa County 4th Avenue Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv04245
Defendant:
Unknown Rogers, Unknown Kirk, Unknown Goodard and others
Plaintiff:
John Leo Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon #332031 v. Kerris et al
as 2:2018cv04211
Defendant:
Unknown Rogers, Unknown Kirk, Unknown Marty and others
Plaintiff:
Josef Timothy Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solis v. Stancil et al
as 1:2018cv02842
Respondent:
Carl M. Miedich, S. Maes, Munoz and others
Petitioner:
Arturo Solis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vail v. Allen et al
as 5:2018cv05219
Plaintiff:
Matryne Dewitt Vail
Defendant:
Mike Allen and Ron Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vail v. Allen et al
as 3:2018cv00207
Plaintiff:
Matryne Dewitt Vail
Defendant:
Mike Allen and Ron Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vail v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv09169
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections, Lionel Brown, New York City Health and Hospitals Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Vail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
