Cases 31 - 40 of 839
O'QUINN v. VICE et al
as 4:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M O'QUINN
Defendant:
VICE, N OLDS, GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romain v. Wilkins
as 1:2023cv05099
Plaintiff:
Joseph Romain
Defendant:
Officer Jonathan Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Thomas et al
as 8:2023cv02436
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Major R. Thomas, Captain Schmidtgall, Sergeant John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy D. Wilkins v. E. Lozano et al
as 2:2023cv09163
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Wilkins
Defendant:
E. Lozano, M. Benetes, Santiago Olmos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Wilkins v. Farris et al
as 2:2023cv02403
Plaintiff:
Keith Wilkins
Defendant:
K. Farris, T. McCoard and N. Fujiwara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODARD v. SMITH et al
as 4:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
STEVE LAVON J WOODARD, SR
Defendant:
SMITH, GRIFFIN, BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. State of Idaho
as 1:2023cv00446
Petitioner:
Robert Emanuel Wilkins, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Askew v. Wilkins et al
as 5:2023ct03269
Plaintiff:
Juanita Renee Askew
Defendant:
Maceo Wilkins, Sergeant Woresly, Carman Wooten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poindexter v. Wilkins et al
as 4:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Eddie Poindexter
Defendant:
A Wilkins, L Davis, A Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
