Cases 31 - 40 of 115
Vanartsdalen et al v. Tega Cay, City of et al
as 0:2019cv03204
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael Vanartsdalen, Sr. and M. V., Jr.
Defendant:
Sergeant Larry Neely, Chief of Police Steve Parker, John Doe 8 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fox v. Weatherford et al
as 4:2019cv01966
Defendant:
Gloria Mack, Wal-Mart Stores Inc, John Does 1-4 and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Anthony Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Webster v. Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated
as 3:2019cv00083
Plaintiff:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Prescott, City of et al
as 3:2018cv08324
Defendant:
Prescott, City of, Harvey Skoog, Jodi Rooney and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. WalMart's, President et al
as 1:2018cv00518
Defendant:
Wal-Mart's, Vice President, WalMart's, President, John/Jane Does(s) and others
Plaintiff:
James W.D. Williams, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. Wal-Mart et al
as 5:2018cv00488
Defendant:
Bexar County Jail, San Antonio, Texas and Wal-Mart
Plaintiff:
Travis Shane Cobb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LLP et al
as 8:2018cv00656
Plaintiff:
Karen Wilson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LLP, Daniel Patrick Hepburn, Emily Seibert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Foreman et al
as 4:2018cv00174
Plaintiff:
Michael E Long, Jr
Defendant:
Andrew Foreman, Sandra Keefe, Conway Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Wal-Mart
as 7:2018cv00005
Defendant:
William Bernrtutau, Steve Glover and Wal-Mart
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eddards v. Wal-Mart et al
as 2:2017cv03982
Plaintiff:
Ryan Rush Eddards
Defendant:
Wal-Mart and Maricopa County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
