Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Aiken v. Taylor
as 1:2015cv00771
Petitioner:
Jeremy L. Aiken
Respondent:
William Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brewer v. Gilroy, et al
as 15-7027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY DEWAYNE BREWER
Defendant - Appellee:
DEANA GILROY, Sergeant, FNU PAVLUKEVICK, Corrections Officer, JIMMY MARTIN, Warden's Administrative Assistant and others
Taylor v. Rupert et al
as 6:2015cv00340
Defendant:
John Rupert, Vickie Barrow, Gaye Karriker and others
Plaintiff:
William Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Rupert et al
as 6:2015cv00323
Defendant:
John Rupert, Vickie Barrow, Gaye Karriker and others
Plaintiff:
William Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitmore v. Tharpe et al
as 6:2015cv00097
Plaintiff:
David Robin Whitmore
Defendant:
Bobby Tharpe , Bruce Brannon, Becky Guffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Becker et al
as 3:2015cv05034
Plaintiff:
William Taylor
Defendant:
Becker, Thoma, Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2014cv02845
Plaintiff:
Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Ms. Geady, William Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. United States, et al
as 14-6140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Miller v. Scott, et al
as 14-7016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR CORNELL MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
WADE SCOTT, O.S.P. Chaplain, ROBERT COMPTON, O.S.P. Food Service Superintendent, D. D. JOHNS, O.S.P. Food Service Supervisor and others
Hobbs v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2013cv00815
Petitioner:
William Taylor Hobbs
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
