Cases 41 - 50 of 3,305
Bevins #267562 v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv08061
Plaintiff:
Ryan September Wednesday Bevins
Defendant:
Unknown Richardson, Amy Lucero, Unknown McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman v. Roby
as 6:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Timothy S. Coffman
Respondent:
Amy Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jonathan Armstrong v. Amy Shipley, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Armstrong
Defendant:
Amy Shipley, Laura Barner, Dr. Dehner and others
Glenn Arthur Smith Jr. v. Amy Boncher et al
as 2:2024cv02459
Petitioner:
Glenn Arthur Smith Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Boncher and Collete S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Shattuck-Knaebel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00454
Defendant:
Unknown Nichols, Missouri Department of Corrections, Bed Broker at Fulton Reception Diagnostic Center (2015) and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Shattuck-Knaebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wedington v. Boncher
as 24-1273
Petitioner:
CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON
Respondent:
AMY BONCHER, Warden, FMC Devens
Gordon v. Manning et al
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gordon
Defendant:
John Manning, Lee, Angela Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Cookie Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thompson
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Allyson Lambert, Amanda Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Hambrick v. Robey et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Brandon Hambrick, Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Robey and Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
