Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 6,288
Burnham v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00336
Plaintiff: Richard Burnham
Defendant: Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnham v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff: Richard Burnham
Defendant: Tim Hooper and Jacob Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillip Jones v. Tim Shoop
as 24-3356
Petitioner: PHILLIP L. JONES
Respondent: TIM SHOOP, Warden
Johnson v. Tims et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00496
Plaintiff: Steven Miller Johnson
Defendant: Shana Tims, Nicole McDade and Wisconsin Department of Corrections Division of Community Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Nortrick v. Hooper
as 24-30274
Petitioner: Roy Van Nortrick
Respondent: Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Grayer v. Murrill et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Petitioner: James Grayer
Respondent: Liz Murrill and Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rutledge v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant: William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff: Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R, A D R and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv00970
Plaintiff: Philip Anthony
Defendant: Tim Hooper
Respondent: Louisiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin Woods v. Tim Shoop
as 24-3318
Petitioner: FRANKLIN SCOTT WOODS
Respondent: TIM SHOOP
Sparkman v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv01030
Plaintiff: Nakeith C Sparkman
Defendant: Tim Hooper
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?