Cases 41 - 50 of 168
CASON v. DAVIS
as 2:2018cv09540
Petitioner:
KAMILA CASON
Respondent:
SARAH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Pixley et al
as 3:2017cv00634
Plaintiff:
Dan E. Johnson
Defendant:
Warden Pixley, Doctor Campbell, Registered Nurse Cason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. North Charleston, City of et al
as 2:2017cv01508
Plaintiff:
Cason O Murray
Defendant:
North Charleston, City of , Ryan Kristofer Terrell , Charleston County Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cason Cunningham v. Norm Kramer, et al
as 17-15430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CASON D. CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
NORM KRAMER, Ex-Director of Coalinga State Hospital
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMELA AHLIN, Ex-Director of Coalinga State Hospital, AUDREY KING, Ex-Director of Coalinga State Hospital, STEPHEN MAYBERG, Ex-Director of California Department of State Hospitals and others
Cason v. Carter et al
as 1:2017cv01018
Plaintiff:
Kevin S Cason
Defendant:
Nicole Carter, Meredith Hayden, Daniel Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cason v. Kelley et al
as 1:2017cv01019
Plaintiff:
Kevin S Cason
Defendant:
Brandon Kelley, Matt Brooks, J W Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cason v. Carter et al
as 4:2017cv00126
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sanchez Cason
Defendant:
Nicole Carter, Meredith Hayden, Daniel Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cason v. Kelley et al
as 4:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
Kevin S Cason
Defendant:
Brandon Kelley, Matt Brooks, J W Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cason v. Hayden et al
as 1:2017cv01010
Defendant:
Meredith Hayden, Seth Abernathy, Adella Burr and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin S Cason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cason v. Hayden et al
as 4:2017cv00033
Defendant:
Meredith Hayden, Seth Abernathy, Adella Burr and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin S Cason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
